?

Log in

No account? Create an account

(no subject)

« previous entry | next entry »
Oct. 31st, 2003 | 01:24 am

Now, who is gonna say how Bill O'Reilly is biased?
He reports the truth and brings up topics that the liberal media won't dream of printing....
It's not his fault the democratic party is so fucked up and ends up being the brunt of the things he talks about... Get them to clean house and you will see what I am talking about...



A couple of weeks ago in this space I ran down the strengths and weaknesses of the Democratic presidential contenders, so now to be "fair and balanced" let's evaluate President Bush.

His strongest suit is the bond he forged with the American people immediately following the terror attack on September 11th. Mr. Bush reacted the way most Americans reacted: with anger and a stark determination to right the wrong.

And he did, he dethroned the Taliban and sent Al Qaeda into the caves. That sequence of events provided Bush with an emotional attachment to the folks. Only two other American Presidents in my lifetime have had that: John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.

George W. Bush is also a strong leader. He doesn't waffle around, and he isn't poll driven. He makes determinations and sticks to them. Some believe this is a minus, but I think a strong leader is a major plus in this time of terror.

So, the President's determination to stay the course could very much help him win re-election if the course is deemed successful. That's the hard part.

Also, Mr. Bush is seen as an honest man who espouses traditional values. That will shore up his conservative base, and even though he's a huge spender, the right-wing will not abandon him.

Finally in the plus department, the President is helped by those who are demonizing him. The criticism is so over the top in many quarters that legitimate questions about Bush's leadership are sometimes lost among all the vitriol.

The loony left's defamatory attacks persuade no one; they are simply shrill notes to the choir that already despises the President. Bush rarely responds to the grenades, wisely calculating that the excessive venom will turn off independent-thinking Americans.

And now for the downside. The President rarely shows his affable side, because he distrusts his ability to communicate. He cloisters himself behind iron gates when he should be holding town meetings and interacting with the people. When Mr. Bush speaks from the heart, he comes across well.

When he relies on canned speeches and statements, he looks like Don Knotts. He has good reason to distrust the press, but that doesn't mean he should avoid it. Mr. Bush's inaccessibility is a major drawback.

While the economy is picking up and will recede as a major campaign issue, the President has enormous problems in Iraq. He must acknowledge those difficulties and explain the mistakes his administration has made.

Mr. Bush continues to run a tightly controlled, closed shop. This will hurt him in a close election race. Americans will accept mistakes from a President, but they will not accept uncertainty. Bush's failure to get out in front of the administration's problems and define the payoff a stable Iraq will deliver is the biggest weapon the democrats have against him.

The President is generally disliked overseas and that's not good. He is portrayed in many places as an American chauvinist with a poor frame of reference. Thus, he is underestimated by prigs like Chirac and Schroeder.

The upside is that Mr. Bush is feared by the bad guys. Osama will not be visiting a Club Med anytime soon. But the President should make an attempt to be conciliatory to countries that might possibly help America down the road. He must swallow some pride, and if he doesn't, the country will suffer.

All in all, George W. Bush could go either way in the history books. If his Iraqi gamble pays off and worldwide terrorism is kept on the defensive, he will be well remembered. If Iraq degenerates into a fiasco, he'll sidle up alongside Lyndon Johnson.

Like him or not, the President is a man of strength and weakness. But the war on terror will define him, and that war is still to be determined.

Link | Leave a comment | Share

Comments {5}

NightHawk Al

(no subject)

from: nighthawkal
date: Oct. 30th, 2003 11:01 pm (UTC)
Link

I really like Bill O'Reilly. I like his use of logic...

Reply | Thread

irisira03

(no subject)

from: irisira03
date: Oct. 31st, 2003 03:42 am (UTC)
Link

I don't dislike Bill O'Reilly. He gives a good argument for Bush. Doesn't mean I agree with it. :-)

Reply | Thread

litchick

(no subject)

from: litchick
date: Oct. 31st, 2003 08:13 am (UTC)
Link

Dear Don,

I always appreciate your posts on Bill O'Reilly and try to read them with an open mind.

I have a book suggestion for you, "Lies and the Lying Liers That Tell Them," by Al Franken.

:-D

Reply | Thread

Jinny

(no subject)

from: luciddream711
date: Oct. 31st, 2003 09:27 am (UTC)
Link

lol Bill o' reilly HATES Al franken haha....

all he did was bitch about him on Howard Stern non-stop

Reply | Parent | Thread

litchick

(no subject)

from: litchick
date: Oct. 31st, 2003 03:20 pm (UTC)
Link

Yeah, if I was O'Reilly, I would hate Fraken too - but not being O'Reilly I don't worry about it.

Did you hear about his interview on NPR? Classic.

Reply | Parent | Thread