Couldn't say it better myself...
« previous entry | next entry »
Feb. 9th, 2003 | 02:56 am
To see this original post in
justgoto's journal...
go here:
http://www.livejournal.com/talkread.bml?journal=justgoto&itemid=245917
They say, "Why are we going after Iraq, when there are other countries with weapons of mass destruction?"
I haven’t heard that argument since second grade! That’s like saying, "Joey, and Sally are doing it, why can’t Bobby?" I guess we'll have to be fair and declare war on every country. Shit like this shows your ignorance, I won't comment on the stupid assertions like; "He just wants to show off to his dad."
Another thing they said was, "I don’t see any proof that Sadam has weapons of mass destruction! But in the same paragraph they tell us that if we go in there, he will use them on us. Do I really need to explain this to you guys?
Every weapons inspector, (even Scott Ritter,) has told us that Sadam has the weapons and has shown no proof that he has destroyed them. The inspectors are not there to find weapons of mass destruction but to get proof that he has disarmed, there has been no proof to date!
Proof that missiles were hidden!
http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/12/02/sproject.irq.inspectors/index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2533847.stm
They say, "Lets give the inspectors time to do their job!"
I think 12 years time, finding no proof of disarming has been sufficient!
http://www.desert-storm.com/War/chronology.html
They also say, "Lets not rush into war!"
This war has been going on since 1990! After 12 years of him defying Un resolutions and the terms of surrender, I think it is high time to kick his ass!
http://www.tufts.edu/departments/fletcher/multi/gulf_states/resolution_687.html
How many UN resolutions does Sadam have to violate before the UN will do something?
http://globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/un/#sres
Most of the rhetoric that is being spewed was brought up by Scott Ritter;
"Iraq is not disarming," Mr. Ritter said on Aug. 27, 1998. Baghdad's failure to do so "means that Iraq will, in effect, win the Gulf War." How then can Mr. Ritter credibly appear before the Iraqi parliament as he did on Sept. 8 and declare that Iraq "is not a threat to its neighbors," and that Iraq's unaccounted-for weapons materiel "does not constitute a viable weapons capability?"
http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/08/ritter.iraq/
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20020918-239312.htm
Don’t listen to the words of a warmonger, listen to your own political god.
http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/1998/msg00297.html
They say, "Iraq has done nothing to us!"
Bullshit! They used biological weapons on our boys! What do you think Gulf War Syndrome is?
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/
http://www.va.gov/gulfwar/docs/Riskfactor6.doc
They say, "We already are in a war with terrorists, why start another?"
This is that same war!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0%2C2763%2C779359%2C00.html
http://news.indiainfo.com/spotlight/usstrikes/08defectors.html
http://metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-46/reg/iraqi_defector_tells.htm
They say, "why are we the only country that thinks Iraq is a threat?"
Don’t you listen to any news at all? England and Australia are firmly on our side! Russia has changed their position drastically!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,76928,00.html
Why do some of you burry your head in the sand, letting others make your decisions for you, not looking at the facts? Why repeat over and over some sound byte from a politician that is totally without merit? It amazes me that some of you follow the politicians that never answer the questions brought to them. It is always the same old shit with them; they are told what to say beforehand, and that is the only thing they will address! How you can’t see through that shit I have no idea! But I’ll be damned if I sit here and silently while everyone spouts their crap!
I urge everyone that agrees with me to not comment but instead, watch this rather long video of our boys in action!
http://www.factsofisrael.com/load.php?p=/blog/archives/000560.html
do we need MORE reasons???
go here:
http://www.livejournal.com/talkread.bml?journal=justgoto&itemid=245917
They say, "Why are we going after Iraq, when there are other countries with weapons of mass destruction?"
I haven’t heard that argument since second grade! That’s like saying, "Joey, and Sally are doing it, why can’t Bobby?" I guess we'll have to be fair and declare war on every country. Shit like this shows your ignorance, I won't comment on the stupid assertions like; "He just wants to show off to his dad."
Another thing they said was, "I don’t see any proof that Sadam has weapons of mass destruction! But in the same paragraph they tell us that if we go in there, he will use them on us. Do I really need to explain this to you guys?
Every weapons inspector, (even Scott Ritter,) has told us that Sadam has the weapons and has shown no proof that he has destroyed them. The inspectors are not there to find weapons of mass destruction but to get proof that he has disarmed, there has been no proof to date!
Proof that missiles were hidden!
http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/12/02/sproject.irq.inspectors/index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2533847.stm
They say, "Lets give the inspectors time to do their job!"
I think 12 years time, finding no proof of disarming has been sufficient!
http://www.desert-storm.com/War/chronology.html
They also say, "Lets not rush into war!"
This war has been going on since 1990! After 12 years of him defying Un resolutions and the terms of surrender, I think it is high time to kick his ass!
http://www.tufts.edu/departments/fletcher/multi/gulf_states/resolution_687.html
How many UN resolutions does Sadam have to violate before the UN will do something?
http://globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/un/#sres
Most of the rhetoric that is being spewed was brought up by Scott Ritter;
"Iraq is not disarming," Mr. Ritter said on Aug. 27, 1998. Baghdad's failure to do so "means that Iraq will, in effect, win the Gulf War." How then can Mr. Ritter credibly appear before the Iraqi parliament as he did on Sept. 8 and declare that Iraq "is not a threat to its neighbors," and that Iraq's unaccounted-for weapons materiel "does not constitute a viable weapons capability?"
http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/08/ritter.iraq/
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20020918-239312.htm
Don’t listen to the words of a warmonger, listen to your own political god.
http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/1998/msg00297.html
They say, "Iraq has done nothing to us!"
Bullshit! They used biological weapons on our boys! What do you think Gulf War Syndrome is?
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/
http://www.va.gov/gulfwar/docs/Riskfactor6.doc
They say, "We already are in a war with terrorists, why start another?"
This is that same war!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0%2C2763%2C779359%2C00.html
http://news.indiainfo.com/spotlight/usstrikes/08defectors.html
http://metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-46/reg/iraqi_defector_tells.htm
They say, "why are we the only country that thinks Iraq is a threat?"
Don’t you listen to any news at all? England and Australia are firmly on our side! Russia has changed their position drastically!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,76928,00.html
Why do some of you burry your head in the sand, letting others make your decisions for you, not looking at the facts? Why repeat over and over some sound byte from a politician that is totally without merit? It amazes me that some of you follow the politicians that never answer the questions brought to them. It is always the same old shit with them; they are told what to say beforehand, and that is the only thing they will address! How you can’t see through that shit I have no idea! But I’ll be damned if I sit here and silently while everyone spouts their crap!
I urge everyone that agrees with me to not comment but instead, watch this rather long video of our boys in action!
http://www.factsofisrael.com/load.php?p=/blog/archives/000560.html
do we need MORE reasons???
(no subject)
from:
yuenglingrrl147
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 12:02 am (UTC)
Link
if i walked into a kindergarten classroom and gave each child a government position,
they could do a much better job than the people we have there right now.
Reply | Thread
(no subject)
from:
girlfloyd
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 12:03 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re:
from:
yuenglingrrl147
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 12:31 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re:
from:
girlfloyd
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 12:52 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re:
from:
yuenglingrrl147
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 08:25 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
icyblue
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 12:09 am (UTC)
Link
Can we give this topic a rest for a bit? It's exhausting.
Reply | Thread
Re:
from:
shoshiki
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 12:24 am (UTC)
Link
Nor have I heard any viable solution that would accomplish getting rid of his military, him, and the whole government there...
Reply | Parent | Thread
Lord
from:
spicy_chiklet
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 07:56 am (UTC)
Link
Anyway, thanks for the post. People have been very supportive.
Reply | Thread
Re: Lord
from:
shoshiki
date: Feb. 10th, 2003 12:23 am (UTC)
Link
I've ben thinking a lot about you guys the last couple days... hope things get better!!
*hugs*
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
likeadream
date: Feb. 9th, 2003 08:15 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
from:
glittergabba
date: Feb. 10th, 2003 07:41 pm (UTC)
Link
I just think there are more cons then there are pros to start up a way with Saddam. Plus i have a lot of friends in the military and i'm worried about them. These might be petty reasons..but i have a right to feel the way i do. I think our country should try to find peaceful resolutions then always jumping into war..we have enough countries hating us.
And if bush is soo concerned about weapons of mass destruction..why did we quickly decide to have a peaceful resolution with N. Korea when they came out and admitting to having nuclear weapons and kicked out the UN inspectors and will attack us if we try to attack them???
It doesn't make sense. I honestly think Bush is doing this as revenge because Saddam almost killed his father.
Reply | Thread
Re: very anti war
from:
likeadream
date: Feb. 11th, 2003 05:11 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: very anti war
from:
shoshiki
date: Feb. 16th, 2003 03:44 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: very anti war
from:
likeadream
date: Feb. 16th, 2003 03:57 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: very anti war
from:
shoshiki
date: Feb. 16th, 2003 04:04 pm (UTC)
Link
But if we don't go and try to stop the military of Iraq.. Then it will be american innocent people on out soil being killed..
Which is the better choice?
here or there?
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: very anti war
from:
likeadream
date: Feb. 16th, 2003 05:05 pm (UTC)
Link
I undersand some of the reasons for wanting to go to war. But, I still think we'd be better off not doing it yet.
By the way, are you always this close minded about things?
Reply | Parent | Thread